SAF: Looking Out For Retail Florists

Retail florists are lucky to have a strong, well organized association like the Society of American Florists looking out for them, and this Mother's Day was another example of that.

SAF: Looking Out For Retail Florists


Flowers are the best and most popular gifts at Valentines Day and Mothers Day. Because of this they are also an easy target for advertisers and news outlets.

Take news outlets. They know that in February and May a lot of people are thinking about flowers as the two big floral holidays approach. They also know that they can exploit that interest with sensational headlines.

For example this year no less an institution than the Washington Post chose to go the clickbait route, running a piece by Jennifer Grayson called “Flowers may be nice for Mom, but they’re terrible for Mother Earth.”

Grayson, who calls herself an “environmental journalist,” used outdated and misleading information and blatant exaggeration in a melodramatic plea to readers not to buy flowers for Mother’s Day.

The CEO of SAF, Peter Moran, responded personally, pointing out the clearly defamatory nature of a piece that relied on false or misleading information presented as fact.


Where are the facts? For instance, for Ms. Grayson to claim that flowers “are saturated with a toxic cocktail of chemicals“ is completely inaccurate and makes no sense. In reality, not only are pesticides costly for a business, but overuse would be harmful to the product. Actually, pesticide use in the floral industry has decreased dramatically over the last 15 years, as growers implement natural ways to control bugs – such as good bugs eating bad bugs or plant extracts that attract bugs.

Peter Moran, SAF Chief Executive Officer


Fortunately the public seemed to see through it as well and shared their concerns online. Other websites were also quick to catch on.


Besides utterly wasting our time on an agenda which even if implemented wouldn't make any kind of meaningful environmental difference, Grayson wants to shame us into not buying flowers, period.

Tom Blumer, New busters


The website MarketWatch also went the clickbait route, with a post called “Why you shouldn’t buy mom flowers on Mother’s Day”.

It also included a photograph – a bouquet of flowers with a line through it Ghostbusters style. A lint in the post read “Your mom doesn’t want flowers this Mother’s Day.”, and mentioned a statistic from coupon site RetailMeNot that claimed to show that “only 8% of mothers surveyed said they would like flowers.”

SAF is always quick to respond to negative advertising and this was no exception. The response they received from the editor of MarketWatch was fascinating:


I doubt anything could hurt flowers’ preeminence of as a Mother’s Day gift, but some readers are always searching for alternatives.


Some readers are likely to be interested in alternatives, but the response reveals a contradictory and lazy position. It acknowledges (in private) that flowers are (contrary to their post) so wildly popular as to be untouchable. And, somehow, this means it is OK to run an inaccurate, inflammatory clickbait style headline. They could just have easily gone with "Looking For An Alternative to Flowers?"

While negative editorial coverage is not uncommon much more negative publicity comes in the form of advertising from companies that sell products other than flowers. Desperate for sales they disparage the thing they know most customers want.

In 2015 the Society of American Florists responded to ten instances of negative advertising. A few of companies that chose to disparage flowers included...


    •, who sent an e-mail that read “Flowers don’t last — Kindle does.”
    • Beauty Brands, who sent an email that said “Forget the Flowers.”
    • A Capital Area food bank, that sent an email with the line “Food over flowers … Flowers fade and die away.”
    • FitBit, who ran a TV commercial that said “Moms get the same gift every year for Mother's Day. This year, give the gift that moves her” and showed a vase of flowers being transformed into a FitBit.
    • Goldbely, who sent an email that read “Don’t Send Flowers, Send Food!”
    • Halina European Day Spa & Salon, who in a series of radio ads stated that its services and products last longer than flowers.
    • The NRA, who promoted a giveaway campaign on Facebook with the line “Forget flowers this Mother’s Day.”


In these cases SAF responds by contacting the advertiser and encourages them to sell their products on their own merits. In most cases the negative ads stop almost immediately.

This is just one of the great services that SAF provides retail florists, but it is especially relevant at this time of year. Florists are lucky to have such a strong ally, and should report any incidents of negative publicity.